Some interesting historical "sexology" fragments (SIHSF).
Reading old scientific papers about sex, sexuality, gender, and so on, in light of contemporary understandings and debates is fascinating to me. I'll share just a few of the quotes that I find quite interesting.
Content warning for the sorts of casual prejudice and insensitivity you might expect from cishet male doctors and scientists in the 1950s writing about these topics.
SIHSF.
Here's a section from a 1957 paper explaining the five different biological aspects of "sex", based on studies of intersex people.
Interesting because I often see people treat this as if it's recent knowledge, when it's not. In an earlier paper the author even treats it as well known to experts, but to my annoyance I cannot access that paper anymore.
MONEY, J. (1957). Imprinting and the Establishment of Gender Role. Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry.
SIHSF. cw: old term for "intersex", nb erasure.
Actually that's the same author who introduced to the world the idea of a distinction between "sex" and "gender". Well, here he is later explaining the reasoning behind this distinction. I suppose we have the "strain" on the "etymological stem" of "sex" to thank for it?
Money, J. (1973). Gender Role, Gender Identity, Core Gender Identity: Usage and Definition of Terms. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis.
SIHSF. cw: heteronormativity and intersex erasure.
This chart is fascinating to me. Note: A is Money's theory, while B is what the author favors. Note at least the following:
a) That this concept of "physchosexuality" (basically both gender and sexuality) is clearly shown as a spectrum, and
b) That social and cultural factors play a role in imposing limits on this spectrum.
Diamond, M. (1965). A Critical Evaluation of the Ontogeny of Human Sexual Behavior. The Quarterly Review of Biology