Follow
i wonder if i could get "throw" to push things onto a global variable stack instead of throwing an error
@typhlosion the only issue is there's no pop keyword hmmm
@boots i mean catch is the obvious one but then you're just writing plain ole exception-oriented code
@typhlosion i'd use "throw undefined;" but getting throw to return things is the real issue
@boots i uh, well, uh. keep at it. you'll figure something out
@boots throw it onto the stack