@fluxom_alt hm, sounds smoochable
plurality, grammar
@amsomniac i mean this is basically my original point. english is absolutely a hackable language but as it currently stands there's no way to make that distinction. this might do the trick for the most part? can't tell without trying it
plurality, grammar
@amsomniac this....might work? but at first glance, at least, it seems situational. not seeing how it'd apply if there's a group including both systems and singlets
@ItsMorgan holy FRICK somebody says it. this is still the bane of my existence i fricken hate the assumption that if someone's being nice it's bc they're into u in that one specific way
plurality, grammar
look ik ranting abt english not working is an overworked trope but like
the word for [this individual plural system] and the word for [this group of people] is the same word. there aren't even any distinguishing modifiers that apply to it
this is like, we've got a thing that needs to be fixed but we don't even have a hammer
@CyclopsCaveman self-care
re: very lewd
@FirstProgenitor look i saw the cw and then i read the thing and i did not interpret it lewdly at all
re: very lewd
@FirstProgenitor ....i don't think i was the target audience for this. i misnterpreted it So Hard
@MrControll@sunbeam.city @socalledunitedstates what do you mean people who oppose hierarchies are opposed to hierarchies
re:
@pillowcat great im help
a bug, not a feature.
Genderless* cyberfae & co. at your service
assigned adult by the inexorable passage of time
don't use he/him or she/her pronouns for any of us without express permission
note that if we ever make you uncomfortable in any way please tell us so we know to stop. we're not always good at figuring these things out on our own