Lauren Brian @lbrianwrites@computerfairi.es

I’m the spirit of sharing quality content, please enjoy my favorite meme of all time.

THIS.

This was the meme that would not end...

So do you want to learn to write science fiction and fantasy with Alastair Reynolds and me?
We're doing an online course in November-December and you can sign up now!
https://www.tynewydd.wales/course/digital-course-sci-fi-fantasy/

Following on @pluralistic's brilliant article about the "enshittification" process of companies, I added in something that I thought was missing from Cory's analysis: the role of "The Friedman Doctrine" that the only thing companies should work for are maximizing profits for shareholers... and highlighting how that leaves out not just other stakeholders, but the important variable of "over what time frame."

https://www.techdirt.com/2023/01/24/how-the-friedman-doctrine-leads-to-the-enshittification-of-all-things/

The latest Captain Awkward has a thing I want.to repeat loudly in my social space of artists, queer folks, and organizers:

@angusm @pluralistic Meanwhile, crab corporations will establish crab funeral homes, stealing the carapaces of their clients & selling them through AmazonBasin to hermit crabs who’ve been forced out of their shells by rapid growth caused by pollutants from underwater factories.

KlikKlok - a crustacean social media platform - will be mostly videos of young influencer crabs showing how to DIY bling up your shell for just a few clams.

This will be known as late-shell crabitalism.

@vincent @mtechman @MadMadMadMadRN @pluralistic There is no greater destructor of innovation, equity, and cultural momentum than the god-damned modern corporate obsession with Mergers and Acquisitions.

The Japan Foundation is now offering free access to #Japanese #literature, #manga, #audiobooks, and language study materials in English and Japanese to all U.S. residents through #Libby!

Sign up at https://www.jflalc.org/libby

You can also preview their catalog at https://libbyapp.com/library/jf

#books @bookstodon

So, boston dynamics has put out another video showcasing the Atlas robots, this time having one manipulate a plank of wood to bridge a gap, go retrieve a bag of tools, carry them up some stairs and across the gap, tossing them up onto a platform to a human "construction worker," turning around. knowcking down large box, jumping down onto that box, doing a "sick flip" from that box to the ground, and then turning around giving a thumbs-up.

Everyone should take a look at the BtS video for this one (https://youtu.be/XPVC4IyRTG8); not because it's particularly bias-bracketed or anything— it's still Boston Dynamics trying sell you their "awesome tech"— but rather because their VERY CAREFUL word choices are quite revealing. …These boston dynamics engineers and programmers are all talking AROUND the idea of whether this system is truly autonomous by using words like "we" did such and such, and "wanted to show," and "future research," and terms of art like "predictive programming." All of this provides a kind of obfuscatory cover so people are wowed by Boston Dynamics' capabilities while still letting BD say that they never really "misled" people as to what they're doing in the original video.

So to be clear: This video is NOT the Atlas system autonomously responding to a completely novel situation with no prompting. It IS the result of a lot of hard work, and that work involves a lot of pre-programming and modelling of EXTREMELY similar "likely" situations, with a lot of fuck-ups in the interim, until they get a whole run right enough, and then that's the video they use.

Boston Dynamics is doing a LOT of research into these areas, but the things they've achieved and are planning to work on are not what most people in the public think they are.

Now, that being said, lots of people who thinking about this in terms of what it's going to do to the value of human labour, and I think that overarching question is a very important one. In a better world, what would come to pass is that the jobs dismantled by automation wouldn't matter because we'd all be getting UBI from the taxes levied against the companies which revenues and profits were increased by, again, dismantling humans' jobs. However, as has been noted, the forces of automation are currently controlled by those who want to both a) not have to pay people to work, let alone to just live, AND b) have those same people somehow still continue to pay into consumer capitalism.

We are, as I've said, looking at a post-WORKER economy, not a post-work one.

And this is without getting into the fact that we're not even ACTUALLY looking at a "post-worker" economy! Most "automated" algorithmic tools are still maintained and supported by humans— just humans paid pennies and exploited for their crucial labor; cf., most recently, ChatGPT and Kenyan workers: https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/.

At the end of the day, there are still lots of humans involved in the programming, maintenance, and support of Atlas and other Boston Dynamics stuff, but their labour is often intentionally occulted for a bunch of reasons— chief among them, the prospect of selling more units while paying those humans less.