I read the article, I'm aware. But it's a quote from an elected legislator. Which makes her sound stupid.
π
But still brilliant compared to MTG statements. π
This statement in the article bothered me.
"Kansas Republican leaders have since said more than 100 state and legislative officials have received threatening letters filled with a suspicious powdery substance."
Republican leaders are making a statement, but its unclear if all the recipients are republican.
I would speculate that is the case since they chose a deceased transgender person for the return addressee.
It did say all of them had voted for anti-trans bills.
No it didn't. It said *she believes* the sender could be targeting lawmakers who supported the anti-trans bills. She literally concluded her statement with "And so I think that is where itβs coming from, but I donβt know.β
Its even unclear if all 100 state and legislative officials were directly involved with the votes.
@ScottSoCal
Its the text from the article.
If you get a fraudulent phone call, you could claim to be targeted because they called your specific number. With that data alone, it sounds like speculative paranoia to claim to be targeted.
I think they just didn't want to commit to a larger targeting statement with only the information they have.
But yes, as worded it does sound stupid. π