apparently MatPat has Done Something which i will figure out presently, i see from the rumbles, but i have to be honest, i never particularly liked his game theories
because he never went far enough.
like come on. if we're doing analysis on a text, we are gonna have to GET STUCK IN THERE. not just like superficial connections of what the game has. oh no. you need to be neck deep in metanalysis goddammit.
stupid lewd punchline
I MEAN FOR GOD'S SAKE, I'M AN ENGLISH MAJOR.
UNLESS YOU TALK ABOUT AT LEAST ONE INSTANCE OF OBSCURE SYMBOLISM, I CAN'T CUM, MATPAT