Both of them depict things being broken in a house (or a barn in the other games case) and imply that they're puzzle games where you match the right item to fix the broken stuff and stop it getting worse.
In BOTH cases they always choose the wrong order or items (or both)... Leading to what can only be assumed to be a blatant case of attempted insurance fraud.
(Seriously who pours petrol onto a blazing fire oh my god)
@Felthry i have no idea,. on british television at least if an advert does NOT display gameplay, then it legally has to state "not actual gameplay" or something to that effect... i guess that law isn't global though.
@Nine why... would anyone make ads that advertise gameplay completely different from the actual game
does that fall under false advertisement laws?