Fueled by the insane quality and sharpness of today's cameras and glass, slightly out-of-focus or otherwise technically failed images end up in the trash. Many of them however have artistic value, either in spite of their technical flaw, or even because of it. Let's share some of these images under the tag #badphoto
Under/over exposed images, motion/focus blur, mis-focus, wrong white-balance or bad framing/rotation all fit
Amazing track btw:
Tri Angles - A1 ASCENSION
CW for rapid beats, glitchy aesthetic, very bass centred tune (though not like really loud. surprisingly chill track despite the rapid BPM)
so either it was a song they had up on mp3 dot com back when it was like soundcloud is now, sorta, and it's disappeared (like a lot of really early Celldweller songs and a bunch of remixes people did of Symbiont) or it wasn't actually by them and it's just... also gone.
Dangit I wish I knew where all my minidiscs and my minidsic player are and I hope I ddin't throw them away because I'm pretty sure there were some old songs on there I'll never get back now...
like I know another was called "Just Another Day" but I think it was either by Punchline or Punchbuggy because I downloaded it back in the day when I played the road rash PS1 games and I was looking up other music by one of those two bands I guess?? And now I can't find anything on it at all.
When women make a broad generalization about men*, stop before you reply "but not all men".
We know.
There are two options:
1) Make the broad generalization. Some men will have to stop and self-examine to see if they actually perform the behavior being criticized. Self-examination is good.
2) Specify "some men". This gives men who DO perform the behavior the excuse to say "well they don't mean ME". Enabling failure to self-examine is bad.
h/t @gingerrroot and @c0debabe for the thought
1/2
yeah i'm moving over to chitter.xyz now. Soooo go there! I'm there now.