Χίμαιρα corvids @autistikai@computerfairi.es

no i have never seen this show nor do i have any interest in what the ships are actually like

im just here to be called tf out ok leave me alone

current gendr: deciding what ships you like based on what the "what your favourite ship says about you" series says about people who ship it

"you don't understand people who say they wouldn't date their best friend. like, aren't you best friends with them for a reason?"

who tf authorised this callout post aimed directly at my heart

also friggin h*ck i need to pay more attention to outworld than inworld i mixed up medea and medusa

*side-eyes the person directly responsible for this*

it was gayer when it was in all caps but i dont capitalise things so my apologie for the parts that were lost in translation

last week i talked about medea with my professor for like an hour, she asked me my thoughts on the whole play and i had to refrain from just saying i think medeas really hot, but every iteration of her is just so amazing

this. is a callout post

friendly reminder that there is a song titled "your kerning is shit" and you can purchase it from the artist's bandcamp for 0.69 usd

i say friendly reminder but i only just learned about this. it's fraggin hilarious

https://samzabala.bandcamp.com/track/your-kerning-is-shit-explicit

....so here i am. spending my time scouring the internet for scholarly articles on what are comforting sounds for humans

apparently humans don't usually refer to themselves in the third person like that, which complicates matters

i'm seriously pissed about this. a historian, refusing to do their research before commenting on history. who the hells gave this person their degree. but i'm also too stubborn to put this down without unpacking everything wrong about this. and as i can't understand what's being said, that may take a while

like seriously i can't parse a word they're saying it's buried behind so many layers of misinformation, false conclusions, and lack of research. this person is supposed to be a historian, but all they seem to be documenting is their own bias

how to summarise the work of an author who refuses to engage logically with their audience. wtf

they set me up to think one of the characters was queer-coded and snuck in actual gays while i was in the middle of being disappointed about the queer-coded character turning out to be straight