Show newer

@hollie I mean, it kinda is that at least in our case, but the concepts of having separate identities, fronting/switching, and a headspace to interact in really work well for us.

Kinda wish there were a "hobbyists messing with their brains" wiki, encompassing meditation, hypnosis, psychedelics, magic systems..

@hollie I try to warn anyone who's questioning plurality and asking me advice that reaching out is likely to disrupt their life.

I don't think the idea that this is a goal of meditation is mainstream, but anyone teaching it with that goal should warn about the disruption IMO, especially if they're teaching it to people who aren't in a retreat environment and have responsibilities they need to keep up with. (2/2)

@hollie I suspect meditation circles would frame systemhood differently, and I only encountered those ideas because of the communities I was in. I also occasionally find stuff like this which to me sounds very plural: awakin.org/v2/read/view.php?ti

I know that when system members discover themselves, it tends to lead to a short-term lack of function as they adapt to their changing dynamic. (1/2)

@hollie Come to think of it, all of the adverse effects for us related to being a system and not knowing that.

@hollie Notes might help. I just watched through most of it.

I have little direct experience with meditation but I feel like it falls in a more general category of "brain hacking" which I do have experience with (mostly via hypnosis). I expected that to have risks, it did have (thankfully relatively brief) adverse effects, it's greatly improved my life now and don't regret any of it but there are a few things I wish I'd been specifically warned about.

@hollie Decided to scan through. The details that are interesting to me seem to start at around 17:00.

@hollie Kinda wish there was a form I could just read because I'm interested but I don't want to sit through a long video..

(I/we also have a very weird perspective on meditation, not sure how aware you are of that.)

@hollie Actually I'm gonna use this thread to test out something silly, hang on.

@hollie Only if it's a reply to someone you're also following, I think.

@hollie Maybe after doing the first one you can reply to the bot's reply to you so at least there's just one thread?

@hollie And I just tried a DM and it turns out you can't. So I don't think there's any work-around.

@hollie Were you intending for this to show up in my timeline? Might want to DM the bot in future if not..

@b0rk Proton and Wine Staging are both examples of long-lived forks that I think rebase specifically because they want very detailed bookkeeping on the current differences from upstream, but not necessarily how they got there.

@b0rk I used both in different situations, so the idea that it's situational appeals to me personally. I think I look at it as: how likely am I to care about my changes to upstream as a logical series? If I want to revert some of my changes, bisect compared to the upstream, port some changes to other projects with the same upstream, or send a subset of them upstream, rebasing now will save me time later. If not, I probably don't care and will merge.

How to order an ice cream in Vulkan:

- Is this a store?
- One that sells ice cream?
- One that accepts credit cards?
- One that has a menu?
- And the menu has ice cream?
- And at least one menu item is a cone?
- Does the cone support the ice cream?
- Can you see my wallet?
- Can you see my credit card?
- Can you swipe the credit card?
- May I have the cone?
- May I have the ice cream?
- May I put the ice cream in the cone?
- Is the ice cream real?
- Is the cone real?
- Am I real?

streaming 

twitch.tv/madewokherd It's been a while but I'm making another attempt to finish Klonoa.

Show older
Computer Fairies

Computer Fairies is a Mastodon instance that aims to be as queer, friendly and furry as possible. We welcome all kinds of computer fairies!