I am looking for a (preferably derogatory) term to evoke the steaming, interconnected mess of for-profit academic publishing, research-institution and funding-body selection criteria, and research career structure.
I was thinking of something like an analogue to "military-industrial complex" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex) - so something like "academic-publishing research-institution industrial complex".
I would greatly appreciate suggestions for a name for this.
@openscience @academicchatter #OpenScience #OpenAccess @petersuber @albertcardona @brembs @jonny @UlrikeHahn
Decided to check where it's possible to watch Oshi no Ko legally
Crunchyroll: This series isn't listed
Hidive: No series are listed at all. The front page just says "No content available". what
Amazon (🤮) Prime Video: This series is listed, but it says it's not available in my country (at least they're upfront about it)
Possible other streaming sites?: I have no idea how to find out if there are any. I didn't see any on Google, at least
Cool. It's great how piracy is a solved problem
So present Joe Biden came down with COVID-19 and the YouTuber who interviewed him has questions about contact tracing or the complete lack thereof.
the most hilarious thing in audiophile digital technology to me btw is direct stream digital. a technology that requires such an absurdly high notional sample rate that it causes serious ultrasonic noise problems, and has to be converted from pcm anyway so what's the point
Of course the claimant backed down. How could they do otherwise?
But the fact remains that they should face legal repercussions for claiming ownership over something they don't own.
I should, at least, be able to bill them for the time I spent dealing with their spurious claim, but frankly the repercussions should be worse and deeper than that.
Issuing an illegal takedown notice should come with serious risk.
I just got a copyright claim against a video I posted on youtube 10 years ago.
The video is a film by Georges Melies that was shot in the 1890s.
Someone is attempting to claim copyright over a film that is 130 years old, who's director died 86 years ago.
Now 1) I don't give a shit about this clip on youtube. 2) The person who made this claim is clearly in the wrong. 3) I can't be the only one that they have targeted illegally. 4) Youtube is a problem.
As an archivist, let me say clearly:
Modern copyright law is actively harmful to the preservation and study of our culture.
It harms artists by giving undue power to publishers. It harms artists by limiting remixes. It harms preservation and research efforts.
It's broken. It's bad. It should be massively reformed.
Trans woman, bisexual, someone's fiancée, forever a programmer, poly, and former total mess