i also do not mean threatening in the sense of obviously politically hostile. if someone pops up and their entire thing appears to be "i want [the likes of you] dead" then, obviously, i'm not particularly inclined to want to deal with them, even if the conversation is cordial
i do not mean threatening in a purely practical sense. if the likes of Ch*ya R*ich*k were to appear in my mentions, i would backpedal as hard and fast out of that as i possibly could, because interacting with them means people are about to send death threats to your house
but also an unwillingness to even fully understand what they're trying to say, like the content itself is somehow potentially toxic and you're in the same room and aren't wearing a mask
if someone seems superficially to have a lot of similarities in what you believe, but you suspect them to Secretly be the Other, does that make them threatening?
by threatening i mean. a kind of discomfort with engaging with what they've written. an unwillingness to interact
i assume this must be a common experience but i do not have a name for it, but it's like...
when you see someone make a point you think you agree with
and then you check their profile, and they seem to be of a Different (e.g.) political persuasion
are they... threatening?
plea to vote, just let me make this one pitch, uspol
This isn't about lesser evil. We're already boiling frogs voting on whether the burner should be set to max.
Democrats are parasites feeding off your desperation, and it works because the leverage is real, and they're more willing to let society collapse than compromise the injustice of America. This state of affairs is actionable. That's the leverage.
He is a literal actual nazi.
Dead frogs can't stop the boiling.
Trans woman, bisexual, someone's fiancée, forever a programmer, poly, and former total mess