Show newer

re: urgent mutual aid post for food and electricity please boost 💜 

@avie sent what i can to help at least with the elec 💜​

To survive in this environment, you have to remember that you are not the risk owner. It is your role to assess the risks, design the controls and assure them in operation. If the risk owner doesn't want to listen to you, that's their funeral.

And always remember that security engineering is a sought after discipline. If something is making you really uncomfortable, hit the bricks. You'll have a new job in a week.

Show thread

6) Some engineers are fatalists. To them, there is nothing that they could do to prevent their system being compromised, so why bother?

7) Security vendors do not help, because they promote messages about how scary the threat is, and how organisations should prioritise defending against APTs over getting the basics right.

8) It is exceedingly rare that management will give security sufficient authority in engineering governance. Things will go out the door that you are deeply uncomfortable with.

9) Change control board is where security controls go to die

10) Nobody appreciates being told "I told you so."

Show thread

4) When times get tough, secure by design is the first thing to be pared back. This is probably related to it being seen as a nice to have, and not an essential performance requirement. To get it right, it has to mature at the same speed as, and intimately related with, the design. But when the project goes on a diet, engineering will still progress and security has to catch up later, after many opportunities are lost.

5) In the absence of an effective regulator, investors and 'visionaries' will always prioritise features and time to market over security. Socialise risk. Privatise profit.

Show thread

I've spent the last 9 years of my life developing, promoting and using secure by design in my engineering field, and I've learnt a few lessons:

1) Techbros *hate* SbyD. They see it as a blocker and they don't want to engage with it at all.

2) Safety engineers don't trust security, and don't want security within 1,000 miles of safety systems, even when its purpose is to assure the integrity and availability of those systems.

3) Programme managers and project engineers never budget enough resources for it. It's either an add-on, or a nice to have, but rarely embedded.

theguardian.com/technology/202

@avon_deer "Only benefit the tinest minority" gotta challenge that because whoever wrote that should stand somewhere on Wellington Road on an evening and watch all the cyclists heading out of Leeds.

Don't get me wrong; I agree that they're a central gov cop out and we really need some kind of metro/light rail for the entire region, but the cycle lanes are being used pretty well.

distributing software as flareware (license condition: evolve an eevee to flareon)

It's been a while since I did these and I still get requests for them so.. IKEA sheets are back! They're £20 and make a great gift or a fun thing for your profile! Examples here imgur.com/a/sa1yGhn
Comment or DM me for a slot!
Boosts very much welcomed!❤️

re: a truly surprising and unexpected post 

@LunaDragofelis @PsyChuan Oh thank you for the information!! <3

Got this Ikea-style ref sheet from @moon :3 Check 'em out if you want one for yourself :)

#furryart #snep

re: a truly surprising and unexpected post 

@PsyChuan Oh I guess I'm not sure! I guess maybe? If anything it's hard for me to be sure because I am Very Specific with some of the things I want to be, haha.

re: a truly surprising and unexpected post 

@PsyChuan Ohh yeah, I know of the therian symbol but wasn't sure what it mean in context with the thinking and question mark ^^;

But yes I would 100% do anything to become my fursona RL.

re: a truly surprising and unexpected post 

@PsyChuan I'm not sure what that means, haha ^^:

Show older
Computer Fairies

Computer Fairies is a Mastodon instance that aims to be as queer, friendly and furry as possible. We welcome all kinds of computer fairies!