Basic necessities and more superflous stuff shouldn't be produced and distributed under the same system

Money should be a secondary system at best, not the primary way in which we get basic resources.

Then, worst case scenario is "I have to wait a couple of months instead of being an early adopter of this new device" rather than "I'm gonna starve this month while my ex-boss feasts"

Some positions I'd like would be social media manager, artist for socially conscious pages (open-source, right-to-repair, human rights, ecology and so on) as well as some more light-hearted posts around the project itself and other cool relevant topics.

It doesn't solve human and ecological exploitation, it makes it worse in most cases.
Unless you take care of those things, it's not "better than money", it's just a different kind of money. (2/2)

Show thread

It's weird how many crypto enthusiasts believe it "solves" money. "Money 2.0" can't solve its inherent issues, only post-money mindsets can.
It's like...instead of getting currency from a foreign country on an exchange because you have "faith" in its "value", you get it from a country-less entity. Wether you like that organization or not, they can't solve the issues that plague global capitalism because they are built under the same basic principles.

TeaBeast boosted

People who upload ROMs, ISOs, and other media images are fucking heroes.

As are firmware breakers and flashcard makers.

Computer Fairies

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!