CWs are not censorship. CWs are a tool to allow consent.

Boosting this again because I've just had to deal with someone railing against CWs because "you can either be in favor of freedom of speech or in favor of choosing what you hear" and :blobugh:

Sam the Octopus
image/svg+xml Follow

@noelle so wait, he's got a locked account, which must mean he's using followers only toots because otherwise why have a locked account

Which must mean that he's choosing which toots to make public, and which to keep private... Isn't that self-censorship by his definition?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Computer Fairies

Computer Fairies is a Mastodon instance that aims to be as queer, friendly and furry as possible. We welcome all kinds of computer fairies!

This instance uses Mutant Standard emoji made by Dzuk, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.