@boxo@anarchism.space 🤔 in that case i'm betting the teacher, if they're canny, is being intentionally ambiguous
get good student brownie points by talking about both senses of object of law - the purpose of the law, and the people directly affected by it. top it off with a nice little half-twist of "one cannot truly separate the intent of the action and the effect of the action" to look extra smartypants.
@noelle @OchotonidKnight (also worth reading Chuck Amuck for tales of things like the guy who ran a sandwich shop complete with making his animation desk into a makeshift grill and delivering lunches via baskets lowered out the window, because it turns out the wackiness level of people drawing Bugs Bunny cartoons is, in fact, just as high as you could imagine)
@noelle @OchotonidKnight one thing that really helped me beat this attitude out of my head was reading other artists go through the same shit.
chuck jones's autobiography was what really hit home for me. he has a very simple philosophy that i've heard espoused by other artists in more elegant metaphors, but his resonated the most: every artist has, let's say, a thousand bad drawings in them. the sooner you do your thousand, the sooner you get to the good shit.
@boxo@anarchism.space you are going to hate this answer but: yes. it could mean either the purpose or the subject, depending on context
of course, legalese is... kind of its own distinct dialect with different rules. so if you are looking at the law itself, it gets even more complicated because you have to then look at what that meaning is in that specific context, which is basically what lawyers do.
what's the larger context? i can probably suss out things a bit more with that (but i am not a lawyer, etc.)
you'd think with the noble viera warrior Really'big Carbuncle i'd have hit my max limit on stupid joke alts that happen to be viera, but no
i do now have a picture i need to draw or get commissioned of my stupid au vader submitting to princess leia's requirement before joining the rebel alliance: photographed holding a sign that says I BLEW UP ALDERAAN #VADERSHAMING
"i did *not* blow up alderaan, i was merely *present* while tarkin-" "he's dead but you're not though so stuff it and hold still so i can take this picture" " *SIGH.* "
Star Wars, Vader shaming
@cute@deadinsi.de ...of course then there's the popular fan theory of that's why darth vader's suit seems such a step back in terms of technology next to luke's hand, etc., as it is an intentional muzzle, so part of the torture palpatine inflicts includes making sure only the shittiest prosthetics are used as a very deliberate limitation device
ah shit i've made it sad again
Star Wars, Vader shaming
@cute@deadinsi.de to be fair you can get real sad real fast thinking about how a lot of this probably should have been, y'know, a parade of red flags about him acting out due to trauma, which the jedi reaction to was "hmmm, feelings? just don't :)"
however "vader shaming" is just a really great cw
also y'know who's a double idiot on this train of thought? fuckin palpatine all "oh yeah, nothing can go wrong with traumatizing THIS guy as a form of recruitment"
i can't believe i've had a true brush with celebrity, ending up in a party with Jared, 19, who Never Learned to Fuckin Read
so in ffxiv i have a macro set up for when my shoulder is being stroppy, saying hi sorry i can't type much my shoulder is acting up (because typing while trying to play the game does get a bit ouchy - but if i shift so only one hand is on keyboard and the other is on mouse, i'm good)
a lot of people have responded very sweetly with "hope you feel better", etc.
today though
i got my fav response yet
"JOKE'S ON THEM, I CAN'T READ"
in which a wigglytuff encounters fatphobia on facebook
boy it sure is cool that cameraphones mean everyone's now super psyched to take pictures of a fat person existing in the world, not blur her face out, not attempt to conceal her identity, but instead present her as something to be mocked because it's a funny meme
did i just have a go at someone and unfriend them for this when they also just posted about their grandmother's death? yes. is that mean? probably.
fuck it. i'm a mean fat bitch.
unfortunately a lot of people are just stuck in - and are going to be stuck in - a cycle of "i have this need. it is valid. therefore, anything i do to fill it is valid. you can't stop me from filling this need." the only solutions they know of and know how to use are, well, bad ones.
i don't know how many would listen when told "this need is valid, but what you're doing - hurting people in order to fulfill it - is not". but at least there's hope in opening up the conversation, i think.
this mostly means that people who have grown up only seeing people use unhealthy strategies will repeat them, and then it's just on repeat for another generation. the cycle of abuse continues. because nobody is speaking up and going "what if you didn't have to hurt yourself and/or other people in order to get this need met? this is a legitimate need, and there's much better solutions than hurt to this problem."
it means the bitter pill of accepting responsibility, but it's also worth it.
bc honestly, as is pretty common with emotional needs, if all you're aware of and all you see as an example of someone asking for help with this need is the really fucked-up ways to do so, you're going to end up thinking that's the ONLY way to ask. it's like thinking food is either magically already on your table, or it's something you have to dupster-dive in the dead of night. people are going to be a lot less stressed about it if you just show them the grocery store and give them a cookbook.
30 y/o - token cishet - tumblr refugee. spoonie/15 chronic conditions in a trenchcoat/actual cyborg. just hangin' in there 