@InspectorCaracal the undercut does give more room to play in basically, though it has higher upkeep/maintenance
lines/designs in it, or keeping it even shorter and going faux-mohawk if you feel like it, which can read very much more masculine
(at the very least it's often good chaff to confuse gender-radars so to speak. i'm very full of medicine and that's the best analogy i got lmfao)
@InspectorCaracal the last picture is a bit of a bad example because it's a bowl cut with an undercut, and i do not think bowl cuts are flattering on Literally Anyone, but if you put in some layers and make that bit a choppy pixie it works much better
@InspectorCaracal yeeeeahhh i think even with an undercut in place, it's just too femme for you - but it does read distinctly more modern/queer (as in first pic) when styled to show off the undercut
it means putting your jawline out there, but maybe consider a choppy pixie undercut? i feel like the undercut also brings structure to the jawbone that gives it some oomph, probably by sort of extending that line on up into the hair, and you can get much more not-straight-femme
(cw for eye contact)
@InspectorCaracal i admit i don't know much and this is a rather femme hairstyle, but maybe something related to a blunt bob? personally i think the straight sides and cut can kinda reinforce the jawline and make it have more oomph, though cutting it short enough to give that effect and frame cheekbones is also popular
honestly will also be excited to see Super Bunnyhop give a well-deserved skewering here
but i think that while it may not be immediate, i actually have massive respect for the dude as like... a legitimate honest to fuck journalist. so i can imagine that his response to this as a hot topic may not be immediate, but only because he has carefully lined up many bowling pins for one hell of a strike.
jim sterling will ofc be nicely angry about it too
reply guy toxicity (+)
@KitsuneAlicia@octodon.social this is a good, good, GOOD fuckin' observation and summary
what makes an odious person odious is the demanding someone's time as a superior. they don't view it as, on some level, an equal exchange - it's something they get to take without giving anything in return. even if that's just as simple as giving politeness.
and of course the most odious of reply guys is the dude who knows up demanding sexual attention, which is just *melodious disgusted gargling*
@InspectorCaracal i've heard from artist friends that there *is* a certain type of breezy asshole who operates in that sort of way, thinking that if they just string somebody along long enough, they'll get a discount of some type
so i want to assure people i'm not doing that
my brain's just scrambled eggs lol
@Sapphicgiraffic@snouts.online this is me writing a toot so i can remind myself that i would like to buy some of these off you!!! i just have to figure out which first
probably the ones that allow you to take pictures with pearl and marina in splatoon 2, but i need to look up which ones are those lol
but i'm writing here to remind myself to do more than just talk about it even if it's just slapping a tenner on the counter and declaring FUCK ME UP, FAM
moonfire faire coming up i think you mean PERFECT EXCUSE FOR NEW SUMMER GLAM TIME #ffxiv
cw for eye contact of a virtual catgirl
it's interesting as it makes it obvious how much more minorities view religion as a promise instead of an immediate tool
the canticle of the turning vs. "it is my god-given right to rule over you". it's the comfort of "swing low, sweet chariot" versus the divine right of kings.
and i'm pretty fucking glad that the 'evangelical atheist' numpties who are excited about a new big stick to hit people with are not tolerated around here
i'm very happy that on mastodon (or at least this bubble of it), i have not encountered anyone of a particular odious type i can only describe as "evangelical atheist" and in fact have seen this shit roundly mocked
bc it's inevitably a white dude sitting upon a throne of privilege who doesn't understand that maybe people have different relationships towards religion than he does as A Stick To Hit People With and who does not understand that his atheism is just swapping out one stick for another
a wigglytuff has a whine about health
listen, pain i can do, but it gets fucking inconvenient when my body decides pain must equal nausea
hey you know what'd help, body? if we didn't feel like the risk of throwing up additional pain meds was too great! or maybe we got a snack even! CEASE THIS NONSENSE
my friends..... i have some SPECIAL LEAKED FOOTAGE...... of @Sapphicgiraffic@snouts.online 's TRUE IDENTITY........ https://i.imgur.com/IsHh9u7.mp4
note: this is a very silly post
in which a wigglytuff looked at the comments to her detriment
after all, it's not a question of IF you'll become disabled. it's WHEN.
it's just that society has said being old is the one valid excuse. (sometimes.)
but if anyone Too Much is not fit to exist in society... well... who am i to convince someone to give up such firmly held beliefs :)
in which a wigglytuff looked at the comments to her detriment
"...so what'll it be, a nursing home where you are ridiculed for asking for your medicine every single day and ANOTHER diaper (what a precious little snowflake you are), or just tied to a tree where the wolves can get you as you are Too Much For Society?"
in which a wigglytuff looked at the comments to her detriment
slate's advice column answered a question from somebody asking essentially "i have multiple mental illnesses and am having 1-3 panic attacks per day, can i ask my workplace for accomodations?"
the comment section is full of ADHD, AUTISM AND TRANS??? YOU'RE JUST TOO MUCH!!
i may have dropped off a snarky comment all "ah yes, as soon as you're less than fully abled, we can get you accommodations in accordance to your wishes..."
30 y/o - token cishet - tumblr refugee. spoonie/15 chronic conditions in a trenchcoat/actual cyborg. just hangin' in there