I just read a somewhat convincing claim that the Voynich manuscript has been translated:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02639904.2019.1599566
...and then a very convincing explanation of how that's not actually true:
@stjohn yeah, I was skimming the original paper, and saw the author misusing linguistic terms and not being particularly clear about how they determined which glyphs are associated with which symbols, but assumed that they would explain it later.
And then the paper just ended, with a side note that the author had "solved" it in just 2 weeks.
I won't lie though, my heart does skip a beat every time I see an article like this. But then I do love a good crackpot theory almost as much as a genuine one, so you can get an endless amount of fun out of this sort of thing. Translations of the Phaistos disc are usually good for a chuckle:
https://unitedcats.wordpress.com/2013/01/21/the-phaistos-disc/