Re: Re: subtoot, but kinda silly and good (it's actually not so silly and good)
Some context on the "crisis actor" thing. That was in the account name that I blocked out. But, the account's been banned now, so, if it was a real person, the risk of exposing anything about them is now zero. So, yeah. Some bot named Crisis Actors.
Re: subtoot, but kinda silly and good (it's actually not so silly and good) (actually, it is quite silly)
Wait, *all events*?! *All* important people?! Actually, this one is quite very silly. Maybe it's not *that* bad
Re: subtoot, but kinda silly and good (it's actually not so silly and good)
I just realized that this one isn't quite as amusing as I thought. The "crisis actor" concept is actually kinda sorta very bad and dangerous. I'd like to think most of us here aren't ignorant, ill-informed, and/or gullible enough to fall for this, but it's still not as amusing because of that thing.
(The tie-in to the Illuminati is an interesting twist, though.)
Re: Subtoot, subtoot meta with respect to myself (not really aimed at others)
In case you think I'm calling you out, I'm not. This is a callout of myself and myself alone.
Subtoot, subtoot meta with respect to myself (not really aimed at others)
I hate that my first thought upon muting someone is "I should also subtoot them." No, me. You should not. Remove them from your timeline and move on with your life. There is no need to do something so toxic.
(This, ofc, isn't to say all subtoots are toxic. But sometimes, it's just uncalled for. Sometimes, it's okay to just mute and move on. You don't have to call out every little thing.)
Si eres nuevo en Fediverse y buscas difundir tu opresión hacia las personas trans y odias bajo una máscara de feminismo falso y trolling de preocupaciones, te puedo asegurar que rechazaremos en cada oportunidad. No hay un cuarto aquí para ese tipo de comportamiento y usted no es bienvenido.
Este es un espacio de inclusión, pero eso no significa que toleraremos su intolerancia.
Piérdete y no vuelvas.
@autistikai Hey, I'm really sorry to "well, actually" this post but Judaism says that it is not only encouraged but mandatory to break religious law, including kashrut, if it is necessary to preserve one's own life. For instance, it is against Jewish law to starve rather than eat pork.
From this we can conclude that it is actually INCUMBENT upon Jews to eat the rich.
Phlebotomist. Cyberwitch. Artist. Fighter. Accidental breaker of computers.
Genderfluid enby. Pansexual/-romantic. Kitsune-kin (9-tailed)/Incubus-kin. Plural, with a bunch of headmates.
DAMNED PROUD ANTIFASCIST and an anarchocommunist.
Be warned: In theory, I post both lewd/NSFW and incredibly personal stuff.
(In practice, it's been a while, but who knows?)