Am I the only #Haskell’er who’s annoyed there’s no `?x <- m` syntax?
My hot take for today is that even if you’re a bit of a conservative contrarian, as a mathematician you should probably still prefer a nice abstraction over a clunky and incomplete enumeration?
Looking for royal patron, please DM me.
RT @tritlo@twitter.com
@koronkebitch@twitter.com tbf you really shouldn't be doing research if you're not a lord or lady living off your estates or have at *least* a royal patron
#Haskell twitter: How do I find out why my Shake file is looping? How do I find out, more generally, why my Haskell program is looping? (So far, attempts to profile only result in empty files and compile errors.)
Got bitten by this so many times
RT @OliverCaldwell@twitter.com
I'm no Python expert, but is this a super common bug? How do people use defaults without this happening?
def x (y=[]):
return y
x() => []
x().append(10)
x() => [10]
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/OliverCaldwell/status/1504472687426498562
I suppose that the answer is that there are many different types of sub and superscripts, and that sometimes you want, e.g., the subscript version of a character to look slightly different, but don't we already have support for ligatures in fonts for exactly that reason?
No matter how I build my executable, I get "the flag -p requires the program to be built with -prof"