jk I'm all about that bread @danishcookies@computerfairi.es

Mastodon isn't good.
Fediverse isn't good.

They have their own problems. Other problems get perpetuated, but guess what.

It is a hell of a lot better than Twitter, because here we can do something at least.

And there are people to help you empower even more.

I take the fediverse over Twitter every time, because here I can actually help people.

@pandora_parrot It's hilarious in a sad way

@maxine this article sounds like complete garbage.

OK, I do agree with the notion that the features aren't picked well and that some are not good.

The reason seems too much leaned onto Twitter again, but are valid.

Though, I have other reasons and there are Msatodon alternatives (pleroma being the most popular)

Honestly, I hope they stay on Twitter and stop writing BS like this, but well.

At least she gets her 15 minutes of fame.

"[...] Some users chat about democratic socialism [...]"
"Visiting Mastodon feels like strolling through the first “apolitical” social network. [...]"

Is this journalism now?

Holy fucking shit.
OK, this is 3 parapgraphs and a picture, but just

wow

just

WOW

First paragraph is already quite telling.

"[...] It runs off a decentralized social media software called Mastodon, and is part of a much larger network of Mastodon communities."

It's also a lot of pleroma and other software instances, not only Mastodon, but OK

Showing off how much the fediverse is understood already.

I agree though, this is not Twitter and that's good

To sum the first part up:

Because people aren't constantly enraged about some fastfood and constantly talk about 45 and are, more or less, just as a hell site as Twitter that causes constant anxiety and you have to fight off bad faith people 100% of the time,

it's apolitical and bad.

Because that's the only politics that exist, ever. If you are not constantly enraged, you are not political, that author says so.