Lauren Brian @lbrianwrites@computerfairi.es

Keep in mind: "When politicians jawbone about "inflation," they're talking about the inflation that matters to creditors [i.e., banks, the financial sector]." NOT the inflation that matters to you.

from @pluralistic https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/19/creditors-vs-workers/#finance-colored-glasses

So, boston dynamics has put out another video showcasing the Atlas robots, this time having one manipulate a plank of wood to bridge a gap, go retrieve a bag of tools, carry them up some stairs and across the gap, tossing them up onto a platform to a human "construction worker," turning around. knowcking down large box, jumping down onto that box, doing a "sick flip" from that box to the ground, and then turning around giving a thumbs-up.

Everyone should take a look at the BtS video for this one (https://youtu.be/XPVC4IyRTG8); not because it's particularly bias-bracketed or anything— it's still Boston Dynamics trying sell you their "awesome tech"— but rather because their VERY CAREFUL word choices are quite revealing. …These boston dynamics engineers and programmers are all talking AROUND the idea of whether this system is truly autonomous by using words like "we" did such and such, and "wanted to show," and "future research," and terms of art like "predictive programming." All of this provides a kind of obfuscatory cover so people are wowed by Boston Dynamics' capabilities while still letting BD say that they never really "misled" people as to what they're doing in the original video.

So to be clear: This video is NOT the Atlas system autonomously responding to a completely novel situation with no prompting. It IS the result of a lot of hard work, and that work involves a lot of pre-programming and modelling of EXTREMELY similar "likely" situations, with a lot of fuck-ups in the interim, until they get a whole run right enough, and then that's the video they use.

Boston Dynamics is doing a LOT of research into these areas, but the things they've achieved and are planning to work on are not what most people in the public think they are.

Now, that being said, lots of people who thinking about this in terms of what it's going to do to the value of human labour, and I think that overarching question is a very important one. In a better world, what would come to pass is that the jobs dismantled by automation wouldn't matter because we'd all be getting UBI from the taxes levied against the companies which revenues and profits were increased by, again, dismantling humans' jobs. However, as has been noted, the forces of automation are currently controlled by those who want to both a) not have to pay people to work, let alone to just live, AND b) have those same people somehow still continue to pay into consumer capitalism.

We are, as I've said, looking at a post-WORKER economy, not a post-work one.

And this is without getting into the fact that we're not even ACTUALLY looking at a "post-worker" economy! Most "automated" algorithmic tools are still maintained and supported by humans— just humans paid pennies and exploited for their crucial labor; cf., most recently, ChatGPT and Kenyan workers: https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/.

At the end of the day, there are still lots of humans involved in the programming, maintenance, and support of Atlas and other Boston Dynamics stuff, but their labour is often intentionally occulted for a bunch of reasons— chief among them, the prospect of selling more units while paying those humans less.

BREAKING: Amazon is cancelling Amazon Smile, the charity program that donates a portion of your purchases to the charity of your choice. I was just notified as a nonprofit director. The last day is Feb 20, just a few weeks from now.

Reminder that Amazon is garbage. I'll add this to my - Amazon is garbage - thread #Amazon #AmazonIsGarbage
(We already moved to eBay LoL)

Hey remember yesterday when I mentioned Polite Society the martial arts wedding heist movie THERE'S A TRAILER NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRFM7HQmkH0

When I was a teenager I knew that I wasn't a lesbian. But it wasn't as simple as calling myself bisexual, either. and I didn't have to think about it too hard, because there was queer, right there, an umbrella term big enough to cover all of us, an invitation to solidarity and inclusion. it was easy. it didn't leave anyone out. it was quick and efficient. you could say it like a flung rock. you could sing it like an aria. it had defiance built in.

I loved this line: "But third, and most importantly, because Twitter’s enshittification is not solely about profit. Whereas the normal course of a platform’s decline involves a symbiosis between corporate extraction and trollish cruelty, the enshittification of Twitter is being driven by an owner who is both a sociopathic helmsan for a corporate extraction machine and a malignant, vicious narcissist." Cory Doctorow @pluralistic https://doctorow.medium.com/what-the-fediverse-does-nt-solve-f2ea32e52afe

Beware the Gifts of Dragons: How D&D’s Open Gaming License May Have Become a Trap for Creators https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/01/beware-gifts-dragons-how-dds-open-gaming-license-may-have-become-trap-creators

I think a real difficulty of establishing "a genre like romance in that the successful establishment or development of a relationship is central, but it's about different types of relationships like friendships, mentorships, etc" is shipping, romance is so embedded as a core part of the way so much of fandoms interact with stories that any developed platonic relationship in any popular story is inevitably, as if reflexively recast as a prologue or stepping stone to a "true" romantic-sexual HEA