bad: the paper uses its own ad-hoc phonemic notation
worse: it uses ^ for ŋ
it also uses a horizontally squashed capital U for ə
bad: the paper uses its own ad-hoc phonemic notation
worse: it uses ^ for ŋ
it also uses a horizontally squashed capital U for ə
@lizardsquid it also uses a bold : for.... some vowel or other, so i think it might just be broken. but im not sure, since everything else looks intentional, even if a bit idiosyncratic