I was reading an essay about the way the centralized powers won the copyright wars of the 1990s and early 2000s. (essay was linked to from p2panda documentation)
https://newdesigncongress.org/en/pub/this-is-fine/
and ran across this quote:
“How the fuck do so many Zoomers not know how to torrent things?” @Ex_AnarchoAnon
So poll time
"On-call Engineer 2026"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sY1UqUuBqQQ
conspiracy theory: Windows 2000 introduced the new theme, “Windows Standard”, with the warmer grey because it defaults to 16-bit High Color and the grey in the old theme, now called “Windows Classic”, has an unfortunate magenta tinge because RGB565 can't do true greys
🚨 🚨 In four hours, the European Parliament is voting on reinstating Chat Control 1.0. We need 361 MEPs to stand their ground as they did once already. Take action now via https://fightchatcontrol.eu/
Here comes a special boy! It’s Miles! He sees that you’re doing your best and he wants you to hang in there and he’s proud of you!
He’s also a sticker from my recently-launched mini update if you want to invite him into your home!
I'm just saying, I've been doing this a long time, and I've seen both sides of the "programming is free!" and "programming is expensive :(" coin, so I can assure you, you REALLY want to stay on the "free" side.
computers were invented in the *mumblties* and you had to pay to program them
then in the late 70s, you could finally program them! for free! you just had to own a microcomputer! yay
but then in the 80s and 90s you had to buy compilers, which were expensive
by with the 2000s, rapidly compilers and interpreters became free again. anyone could program, for free!
and then in the 2020s someone invented "programming but you have to pay", again.
DON'T FALL FOR THIS TRAP
concluding this thread with LaserDisc Turtle. his name is Flippy. everybody make more art of Flippy now
@whitequark Alright, I've been thinking about it (never a good idea), and here's an attempt at that argument. Note that I'm not an expert on industrial revolution history or any of the technologies I'm about to discuss, so… y'know.
Of all the inventions of the industrial era, the vapor-cycle heat pump was the closest to optimal at its inception and has remained essentially unchanged to the present day, *and* is a completely essential technology to modern life. It's probably not the most *foundational* invention (the steam engine probably takes that crown), but I assert that it is the *greatest*.
For example, the steam engine is a dead technology today.
Or for another example, consider the piston-driven internal combustion engine. Foundational, yes, and ubiquitous in the modern day; but thermodynamically, it's just fundamentally inefficient. We've milked damn near every possible joule of heat recovery out of it, but the only thing it's really good at is low-power efficiency; for essentially every other purpose, the gas turbine is superior. In contrast, *nothing* is superior to the vapor-cycle heat pump at pumping heat.
(The gas turbine, an incredibly simple and effective technology which in its most basic form has *one moving part*, is another contender for greatest invention, but… the externalities of combustion are inescapable.)
So yeah. The refrigerator emerged in the mid-1800s and is essentially unchanged since. Advances in chemistry have greatly improved refrigerants, but the basic structure is still a compressor, condenser, and evaporator all in a loop. It's effective, efficient, free of inherent externalities (the nastiness of fluorocarbons aside, in correct operation they're not *supposed* to leak refrigerant, and simple propane actually works perfectly fine), and *massively* impactful to modern life. (Just think how much of our food is utterly reliant on refrigeration, and we don't even think about it.)
Seen on #Bluesky :
> Feels like the intersection between “every intermediary eventually is incentivized to become a narc” and “every silicon valley company aims to be an intermediary” is a bad one
(source article is geofenced and tells me to go fuck myself, so fuck Chicago Tribune)
This means that software developers are always going to be needed, and a lot of the folks that lost their jobs will end up getting new ones after this shit ends.
When that happens, don't work for the good of the company anymore or for the sake of a product. Work for your fellow workers, including pesky people outside of the tech industry.
In capitalism, a worker can never have true solidarity with an executive. It just isn't possible.
So, fight for each other so we can all win?
9/9
It was really only an illusion, of course. At the first sign of a way to cut back on software developers, the entire tech industry leadership literally highjacked the world economy to rabidly chase it.
How's that going for us all? Software is getting worse, a global economic shock is incoming, and shit sucks.
AI looks backward. It's a mathematical model trained on historical data. Programmers will always be needed because they're able to look forwards and not backwards.
8/9
Trans woman, bisexual, someone's fiancée, forever a programmer, poly, and former total mess
Avatar by mavica