But I had put together how many real world systems are examples of the same thing: mass screening for low prevalence problems.
And how the different situations make it either a good or bad idea.
I knew about the problem of trying to detect something that has low prevalence. The number of false-positives may vastly out number the true-positives.
A very insightful talk!
"FireShonks 2023 - Chat Control: Mass Screenings, Massive Dangers"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-Gi5mEFSq8
@PaulWermer @drahardja True. That reminds me of this comic by #WorkChronicles. https://workchronicles.com/comics/page/38/
@drahardja there is a distressing tendency to reward those who respond to a disaster, while ignoring those who do the difficult work of preventing a disaster. The latter is so much harder to see, and also so much more challenging...
@mavica_again I can totally understand that, I remember holding Skype in pretty high regard when it came to the technical side, even now as I'm pretty sure that technology from Skype is underpinning the calls/meeting functionality in Teams that I've been using a lot the last few years
I guess I just didn't have many friends on Skype back then and when they added more bloat I didn't see the reason to stay
wtf a huge ice block just almost crushed me??? that's not very osha compliant im gonna go complain
@mavica_again not sure I trust M$ to provide a nice experience, I remember how bloated they made Skype after they bought it, It's the same thing they keep doing to Windows and Edge.
Trans woman, bisexual, someone's fiancée, forever a programmer, poly, and former total mess
Avatar by mavica