slightly spicy political-ish whining
as much as i agree wholeheartedly that we need to move away from cars, and promote public transportation, especially availability to disabled folks
i kind of wonder how this gets rectified with a city mouse vs country mouse practicalities
when out in the country, public transportation is really hard to figure out, especially when you take into account that for many people who live out in the countryside it's more than just transportation
slightly spicy political-ish whining
there's just some sort of... big practicalities there
how do we keep it from creating large no-man's-lands in rural environments, basically?
don't get me wrong, incrimental progress is still progress. right now basically everywhere except for some areas of some large cities in the US mean that if you don't have a car, you aren't able to do *anything*, so it's all no-man's-land.
slightly spicy political-ish whining
basically i worry that especially as it becomes a moral precedent, it will end up a way to look down on and sneer at rural communities - that are often also really poor - but also it will mean that more people who are disabled and have limited mobility or are chronically ill etc. have large parts of the country where they are unable to live, whereas 'go in car' is doable now, but with no car and little rural service with public transport...
slightly spicy political-ish whining
i suppose i feel that keenly because the same blinders end up with people wholesale discarding the south if brought to its logical end
not only is this, well, not a tactically sound move, but they refuse to acknowledge the racism there (black people being disenfranchised, kept too poor to move) and the inherent classism behind "well - if these people were worth anything - they would have moved o civilization by now"