I wish there was a place you could go to that was just like a fireproof room with power points where you could try charging dubious batteries and make sure they don't explode
Air to Ground Message:
LMAO I NEED A COFFEE
Area: Jersey Shore, NJ, USA
Type: Bombardier CRJ200
A: #a65ad3fce98
F: #f45e56a43b8
Air to Ground Message:
THX SNEAKY SHANE
Area: Seattle, WA, USA
Type: Boeing 737-700
A: #a755715dad5
F: #fbc6fdd6dc5
Air to Ground Message:
COPY ENROUTE MEOW,THX
Area: New York City, NY, USA
Type: Airbus A320
A: #adb61ae3932
F: #f2e2a93fdf5
Air to Ground Message:
YEAH. I FIDDLED WITH THE KNOB FOR A GOOD 30 SECOONDS. THATS MY BBEST GUESS.
Area: Blaine, MN, USA
Type: Bombardier CRJ900
A: #a65b014b2e0
F: #f2a487d49ba
It looks like the ⍼ saga has finally ended!
The unicode character '⍼' was a mystery first noticed in 2022: https://ionathan.ch/2022/04/09/angzarr.html. It's in the Unicode standard as a mathematical symbol. But no one could find any examples of it having been used, and no one knew what it represented. It was like the only record of an extinct species, fossilized in the Unicode standard.
But now someone has found the document it originally came from! It represents the angle 'Azimuth', and the symbol probably comes from the path light takes through a sextant. https://ionathan.ch/2026/02/16/angzarr.html
(@johncarlosbaez might appreciate this symbol!)
re: ukpol
i know i've been talking about this a lot & it's really because i don't see anyone else talking about it & as i've said before i think people should be aware and pushing back against it. i don't particularly want to be the guy trying to keep on top of this. feel like i'm pissing in the wind a bit
re: ukpol
honestly though i read the parliamentary debate about these amendments and it was depressing. opposition to the government amendment was only framed in support of the lords' own massively-overreaching one, clamouring for a ban asap rather than a potential one in 2 months
so i can't imagine debate over future measures would actually make a difference either way given the set of uninformed authoritarian wankers that occupy both sides of both houses at the moment
re: ukpol
and the supposed pressing need for these powers, the urgency which justifies government giving itself the ability to sidestep democratic process at a stroke, this social media-driven youth mental health crisis which requires immediate action. well it doesn't exist. it's a confected moral panic
re: ukpol
but of course even if this government, somehow, doesn't do anything too bad with its newfound powers, these powers will also remain available to any subsequent government to do with as they will
re: ukpol
the new amendment allows govt to introduce restrictions on children's access to internet services (which effectively means everyone who hasn't ID verified) with no debate and minimal scrutiny. in theory what they do with this will depend on the outcomes of the consultation https://computerfairi.es/web/statuses/116161646979067688
ukpol
so this is the current state of UK gov's planned internet restrictions
the lords amendment proposing a sweeping under-16 ban has been thankfully voted down but the gov amendment allowing them to basically do anything in future is in
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/mar/09/proposed-ban-on-social-media-for-under-16s-rejected-by-mps
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-eyes-sweeping-powers-to-regulate-tech-without-parliamentary-scrutiny/