taizou @lion@computerfairi.es

When I see statements like "teenagers are spending 4-6 hours online, instead of going outside and meeting people" as a justification for further web regulation, I wonder to myself:

- if it had been 4-6 hours reading books, practising musical instruments, creating art, or similar, would they be demanding that books, instruments etc. have a watershed? If not, why not?

- what is the "acceptable" amount of time for a teenager to spend online each day? What makes it so?

- "going outside and meeting people" suggests a particular worldview of what is "good", which will appeal to - indeed, be possible for - some people far more than others. I was never massively sociable, and that's no crime. A day at school, and now work, would involve plenty enough peopling time for me. I am far more sociable online then offline. Where are the local free places where teenagers can get to and hang out, safely, in the warm? (They might exist in some places?)

#EUKIDSAct

これは、パンだね(だいず♂) #北きつね牧場

two cats. worth zooming in (or just look at the cropped versions i’ve attached here)

Nancy By Ernie Bushmiller 09.12.47

全身も描いてるけど気に入らないなぁ

thank you for coming to @beherit's tod talk

I don't like transphobia, and I don't like censorship either. So here's a local mirror of amnesty international's reports.

big boys tongue kissing sloppy style

Pikachu