Show newer

sad , mental stuf 

@azka I'm sorry azka.

I hope you can find more friends soon

:rby_topleft: :rby_top: :rby_top: :rby_top: :rby_top: :rby_top: :rby_top: :rby_top: :rby_topright:
:rby_left: BEGIN :rby_right:
:rby_left: SUPERTHOUGHT :rby_right:
:rby_bottomleft: :rby_bottom: :rby_bottom: :rby_bottom: :rby_bottom: :rby_bottom: :rby_bottom: :rby_bottom: :rby_bottomright:

Aligning non-monospaced text like this is difficult

@what I get so sick of this idea... you can't put yourself in a computer, you can only ever put a copy of yourself in a computer...

I'd still do it, but! it's not immortality for you!

@popefucker@cybre.space side note: (>>=) is actually defined over *any* monad, not just IO

@popefucker@cybre.space sorry, I should have given you the type! It's kinda complex, so let me show you compose first:

(.) :: (b -> c) -> (a -> b) -> (a -> c)

this says "the compose function takes 2 arguments, a function from b to c and a function from a to b, and then returns a function from a to c"

>>= (which is called "bind") is:

(>>=) :: IO a -> (a -> b) -> IO b

which says "the bind function takes 2 arguments, something of type IO a and a function from a to b, then returns something of type IO b"

despite using haskell as my primary language for over 2 years, I have yet to use a monoid

Show older
Computer Fairies

Computer Fairies is a Mastodon instance that aims to be as queer, friendly and furry as possible. We welcome all kinds of computer fairies!