looks like the votes are for the debugging manifesto poster (this one: https://wizardzines.com/images/debugging-manifesto.pdf). I'll set up preorders once we figure out how much it'll cost to print & ship them.
Neurospicy ramblings
@Sophie [Cedar] we can do more than one thing, but how is it that people can have houses and cars and families/pets and have time to take care of all those things?
Neurospicy ramblings
It’s fucked up that I get to do at most one thing per day, and how sometimes that one thing puts me out of commission for multiple days.
It is OP that some people can do multiple things in a single day. “Autism is a superpower!” Bitch you can’t say that to me when you’ve showered, done the dishes, and been to the shops all before lunch.
SCOTUS rules publicly funded charter schools in North Carolina can't force girls to wear skirts as part of the dress code. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/26/1183781580/supreme-court-dress-code
All this conversation about #Meta on #Fedi feels like the worst parts of geek culture. So technical, without understanding context or what strikes can actually do. My thoughts:
Meta will make a great app for Fedi because it has more money to throw at the task. People will start using that because it's better. It will have QTs and an algorithm. People they want to follow will be there.
🧵1/6
@zigg I guess it's passed now but this might be the sort of thing goblin.tools is for?
@hergaiety What if you touched grass with your bare feet?
No, that would probably be too powerful.
Thoughts on meta that no one will read because everyone is tired of this shit
@minego My experience with Facebook is that it *doesn't* let you talk to people on Facebook, and that's why it sucks to use Facebook.
@minego Wtf, people are saying that? Like, yeah it's inevitable and we need to move to open platforms but it still absolutely sucks when the enshittification starts.
The fediverse was never going to be a hockey stick. In the end it's more like a katamari. Picking up people left behind by the corporate internet into a messy ass ball that grows in fits and starts, but can keep on rolling past obstacles that closed systems can't.
Its lack of clearly defined shape is at once its greatest strength and its greatest weakness.
@hollie I don't think you did, but I think I'm coming at this from a perspective of assuming that a lot of the things plurals notice happen behind the scenes for everyone (but not all of them; most people probably don't experience frequent switches for example). But I suppose it's possible that non-plurals have less of a defined structure and can define it more fluidly to fit the goals of IFS.
@hollie IFS comes up a lot in plural spaces, and it's cool but from what I remember it had a lot of specifics about system structure that didn't really match up with the experience of most plurals. Just skimming Wikipedia now, it sounds like there's an idea of only one "self" while for most systems I know, all members are on equal footing.