as a non-USAian, can someone explain why mail-in rebates were so much of a thing in your country? what were companies getting out of paying each individual upwards of USD$30 on an electronics product in the 2000s, their personal information? and nowadays you give it out for free? am i missing something?
@mavica_again Not a citizen of USAtania myself, but I looked into this quite a long time ago, and it appears to be a weird mixture between having anti-trust laws, but not enough consumer protection laws. So it's not blocked by false advertising laws, but also a workaround to minimum price arrangements etc.
Also quite huge in the electronics sector of the 80s/90s. Margins got a lot lower (e.g. by Japan entering the market big time), and everything became more data-driven. So if you mailed in, they got your data, and if you didn't, they "got" your money.
And in general, doing things via mail was quite popular in the US, probably due to its size and sometimes low population density. Mail-in rebates meshes nicely with mail-order catalogs or those registration cards you found everywhere.
@mhd oh yes i understand how the machinations of the mai-in system, what i was more confused about is why would a company be "giving out" so much money for free! it seems personal data is always the answer :)
@mavica_again Advertised prices were always much lower than the full up-front cost, so what they got was valuable marketing data out of everyone who mailed in their rebate coupons and free money out of everyone who didn't.
We were so hesitant to simply give away our data for free because hardly anyone needed us to register an account just to buy something.
@mavica_again I don't know but my first thought is price discrimination - the people who care enough to send the form are likely the same ones who are price-sensitive enough to make the discount worth it for the company.