i make cga portraits if you want one it's USD40 i need money give me work #art #pixelart #commissions
@rainwarrior yeah basically 8088
djgpp can only do 32-bit protected mode so it can only make binaries that run on 386 and up, and i would like to target older machines than that so it's not a viable option
i might look into it but for now i think turbo C++ is going to work for me
@rainwarrior does openwatcom produce IA-16 binaries? the goal here is that i can support XT-class machines, which is why i'm straying away from modern DJGPP toolchains
ohhhh there's a GCC fork that can produce IA-16 binaries.... 👀 👀 👀 https://github.com/tkchia/build-ia16/releases
another reason why i don't want to use modern tools is that, say, the easy path of using DJGPP with GDB et al which you can already get an extension for is that DJGPP requires 386SX minimum because it doesn't make true DOS executables, but rather 32-bit protected mode binaries and i want to support XT-class machines
@bonzoesc however i am still thinking about your cursed idea so thank you for a successful cognitohazard
@bonzoesc i don't even want that i just want intellisense not to yell at borland's old header files going "uhhh this function doesn't exist, because the header file isn't nice and proper C++23 so i'm going to ignore the declaractions in it"
i'm sure there's better ways to develop for DOS with modern tools and forego borland turbo c++ entirely but also i want to use it because it's easier to find period documentation for it
scourge of the fediverse, retired computer fairies founder (2017-2021), drone #6502, official amiga mascot, begrudgingly making a return to the fediverse to upset those who told us to leave. i've been here longer than you.
https://pronoun.gdn/byte?or=it, robot, check system link above, meat shell is 30yo, no minors thanks
HRT: 15/11/2015
⚠️ do not like or favourite my negative posts: https://computerfairi.es/@mavica_again/110573733959251340 you will be blocked for not following protocol