@TrollDecker it's not a big deal? just implementing the reader-and-writer problem
@er1n @TrollDecker i don't know anything about that i'm just following a uni assignment where i have to run 100 threads and measure time is all
@er1n @TrollDecker how come
@TrollDecker isn't that inherent in multithreading regardless of language?
@TrollDecker what happened
@vahnj i'm waiting for all to be done
@kellerfuchs @bea yeah i'm not there yet sorry
@bea uni teaches enterprisey things
@morae thank you
@noelle that's ok <3
@mkosler torn between "Girl" and "javel in"
can someone confirm i'm sane please? given 100 threads (semi-pseudocode, this is java threads)
i should do:
for i = 0 to 100 then thread.start()
for i = 0 to 100 then thread.join()
instead of putting both commands in a single for block, because then the join would block the next thread's execution, right?
roboplush squirrelbun kin girl, accept no substitutes
bunbot girlfriend belonging to @LaserScheme & @noelle & @agiri@masto.ninja
mastodon mascot, computer fairies owner, game music composer, obsessed w/ electronics & 80s
talk to me please? i won't bite
if you wanna follow please try to befriend me first bc i post personal stuff
http://t.me/maple_syrup
discord: maple#3896
http://maple.pet