jk I'm all about that bread @danishcookies@computerfairi.es

@mawr
@mawr
If people are angry about this, let them be. If people wants to mob around these fuckers they have the right to. Their privacy is in risk of compromise and their community is also at risk. They have the right to be angry.

@mawr
The point here is the normalization of these situations. There must be consequences for those who affiliate with cops, be it passive or active.

@mawr
Which is why whenever there's a leak, you need to pry it open and burn it alive so no one would think of doing that shit in the future.

@mawr
Even if they are here they need to know the likes of them will be purged the moment they show themselves or anyone who affiliate with them.

@mawr
At the very least try to. I'm not saying it is to be guaranteed. I'm saying this must stay a taboo and should face harsh criticism from the people.

@mawr
Absolutely no negotiation or compromise with the surveillance machine of the State. Purge them and their complicits from the root.

@mawr
What set Mastodon apart from other media is decentralization. That state of off the grid also means no cops. If one can't protect their users from this basic threat, then they can fuck off.

@Shrigglepuss@octodon.social
They don't wanna fix anything, they just want to not have to see it

@ben
Normally I would agree with this sentiment, but when social capitals come in it gets complicated. If a person has large social capitals, that means they have more influences on the actions of others and so must take more responsibility on the consequences of their actions and how it is perceived. People who passively or actively accumulate social capitals should face more scrutinization from the public as they are a threat in the market of ideas.

@scarly
If there's a fascist sitting at a table with 7 other people, then there're 8 fascists sitting at that table.