jk I'm all about that bread @danishcookies@computerfairi.es

How come there's this weird ass trend amongst historians that just because people of the past don't identify with a certain gender or attraction identity label like modern day means they won't even try to find an approximation? You do that shit all the time with political affiliation. That's literally your fucking job. This sounds like thinly veiled queerphobia to me. Honestly more than half the time they don't even seem to grasp the concept of these identities in modern time.

There was never a shortage of resources in any of these system, just imperialists setting out to murder their opposition.

@it
You know what that's actually fair. I just found out one of my childhood hero believe in over population so...

@boobs_idiot@octodon.social
It's basically missionary, but with camera angles

@it
Uuhhhhhh you sure you want cheater/edgy atheist/alllivesmatter fuck to narrate your life?

@lyliawisteria@todon.nl
Okay, but how is it different from not letting liberals in at all?
@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @scottishwobbly

@lyliawisteria@todon.nl
That's very true. Maybe radicalize them only if you have the condition to do so.
@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @scottishwobbly

@lyliawisteria@todon.nl
Wait what exactly do you mean by that?
@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @scottishwobbly

@lyliawisteria@todon.nl
I'm not saying inviting them into leftist space, then probe. But rather keep an open mind when considering inviting and examine someone before letting them deeper into leftist space.
@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @scottishwobbly

@lyliawisteria@todon.nl
Morally saying, yes. Practically saying, different people have different buttons to push. I used be an ancap in highschool.
@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @scottishwobbly

@lyliawisteria@todon.nl
That is very true. Which is why I said to only radicalize everyone when you have the upper hand
@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @scottishwobbly

@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @lyliawisteria@todon.nl @scottishwobbly
I know the type that set out their "path of righteousness" when they lose hope in the people around them. It's all very sad. Even if they change later it still has lingering effects on them. Just my opinion, but these are the best candidates of the capitalist system to protect itself.

@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city
Part of this stem from the fact that a lot of people don't wanna accept they were abused by the system or in some cases, by their family.
@lyliawisteria@todon.nl @scottishwobbly

@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city
Yeah but ya gotta know to pick the ripe ones from the rest, and to do so discretely under the radar. From personal experience, once they feel like they've secured a place in the system or at least the track they've set out for themselves, it's quite hard to radicalize.
@lyliawisteria@todon.nl @scottishwobbly

@lyliawisteria@todon.nl @Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @scottishwobbly
I would say tho, not everyone can change, or as I should say, not everyone can change until we have the upperhand. What we should do is balancing between radicalizing people and identifying and eliminating threats to the revolution.

@lyliawisteria@todon.nl @Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @scottishwobbly
Even better if you can pick them out and demonstrate their malicious intent to other liberals to radicalize them.

@lyliawisteria@todon.nl
Yeah I didn't phrase that very well. I'd agree to fight social capitalists and infiltration capitalist agents. However we should keep a balance from alienating potential liberals that can be radicalized.
@Wewereseeds@sunbeam.city @scottishwobbly