Show newer

maths + toots = ??? 

When you include a link in mastodon, it's assumed to be exactly 25 characters. So instead of composing a toot of 500 characters, we're going to compose a toot with 20 URLs.

Now, we are going to have to do some experimentation before we can continue – URLs don't have a max size , but certain pieces of software (e.g. Internet Explorer) can't handle URLs longer than 2000 characters.

But that doesn't mean we can't put them in our toot – we have to find out if masto has a limit.

Show thread

maths + toots = ??? 

One small thing we can do: press the "cw" button, and put some of our content in the cw field. This adds 1 extra bit of information (whether the cw field is used or not), bringing us to ~10284.4 bits.

We can also change the privacy level of the toot. We have 5 levels of information there, so we add 2.32193 more bits.

BUT!

We can do even better!

Show thread

maths + toots = ??? 

mastodon appears to count characters as "a unicode character", so 'a' is a character, and so is '임' (rather than twitter, which counts Korean and Chinese characters as being multiple characters, for some reason).

So we can fill up each of our characters with any existing unicode code point.since there are 1,112,064 code points in UTF-8, we can have 10283.4218946 bits of information in one toot.

BUT!

we can do better...

(thanks to @popefucker@cybre.space for sending the maths)

Show thread

maths + toots = ??? 

What is the highest amount of data you can store in a toot?

(We'll assume that we're not attaching a file, because that makes things more complex.)

Let's start with a basic idea: we're going to fill each character of a toot with either a 0 or a 1.

Then we have 500 binary digits, or 500 bits of information.

But we can do better: let's use base-10.

With base-10, we can fill up each char with one of 0-9, which means we have ~1660.96 bits of information.

But we can do better

Classic Doctor Who | Season 9 

I'm really enjoying that the stories have gaps between them now.

They've moved away from what the early episodes did ("We have to show every moment!"), and are letting there be spaces of time that aren't shown, where the Doctor and companions could be doing all sorts of things

Show thread

Classic Doctor Who | The way I'm thinking about things 

By default, every story gets a "Maybe" recommendation.

If it's not very good at all, then I downgrade it to "Don't watch".

If it exceeds my expectations, then it gets upgraded to "Watch".

If it exceeds my expectations AND the answer to the question "If I only watch one story from this season, should I watch this one?" is yes, then it gets upgraded to "Highly Recommended"

Show thread

Classic Doctor Who | Season 9 

The Curse of Peladon is really, really good.

Except the first episode is a bit too slow, so I can't give it a Highly Recommended rating.

Show thread

Classic Doctor Who | Season 9 

I also am really glad the Master isn't here...

Show thread

Classic Doctor Who | Season 9 

heck, I didn't realise it had been 8 days since I last watched any Doctor Who.

But today I'm watching The Curse of Peladon. This is the first story since Claws of Axos that I remember watching as a child.

I'm enjoying it!

Show thread

DurgyDoodleCember 11 

@fluffdragom Durgy is...on the ceiling, suddenly? Is gravity alright?

This is going to give some practical problems.

(I haven't drawn Addi upside-down before, so fae might be a little off in this one)

Show thread

affection request 

The wriggly, smoochable lizard is here 💕

Good morning~

me: [changes discord channels]

discord: wait! that one you just switched away from has some new messages now

me: ok. let's see them

discord: certainly. they're from you

Show older
Computer Fairies

Computer Fairies is a Mastodon instance that aims to be as queer, friendly and furry as possible. We welcome all kinds of computer fairies!