Operating systems aren’t actually that interesting or important. Their purpose is to let people run apps with a minimum of fuss
The purpose of an app is to let people do a specific thing they want to do, which is usually something unrelated to computers. The things people want to do are the important part, not the apps
Tech culture is a vast collective effort to deny these obvious facts because they threaten our sense of our own importance. We’d rather create imaginary kingdoms to rule than admit we exist to serve others
new on the #linkcache
mini-itx.com - A website maintained since the mid 2000s dedicated to the Mini-ITX form-factor of motherboards
Tom's Toys - A collection of web toys, games, tools and experiments
Mike's Digital Pog Page - Maybe we should bring these back along with 88x31 web buttons
3D GIFs by Dave Sutton - A wonderful, free-to-use collection 3D web animations that retain a GeoCities-like charm
re: danger: linux
@jk Linux can't be a cohesive system because Unix never reconsidered configuration as it evolved from a pile of CLI tools with man pages and a dedicated expert admin to a graphical OS where the user is the admin. an operating /system/ would solve the configuration problem once for all programs. in practice *nix people hear this, think "windows registry" and then implement their own config file parser. or they go GNOME and use dconf (good!) but also remove settings for fun
danger: linux
i use linux every day. and when i want to configure something? i don't know where to look, don't know which one of the many configuration utilities to use, have to go on a big forum thread research session to find out what the best practice is for my situation, don't know which config file to alter, don't know if the file will be overridden in the near or far future, don't know why the changes i'm making aren't working, etc. everything is the Principle of Most Surprise, and it sucks
getting told that every website having https is "devaluing the worth" of websites having https, like every website has it now so it doesn't mean anything
while also arguing that google "did the right thing" forcing every website to have https (whether they handle sensitive data or not)
which, as someone who disagrees that static websites need https, i have not heard worse technical arguments in a long while
@mavica_again it's the same with like, fundraiser/donation posts, I see ones with stuff like 'please donate I have 2 days to raise $500 to not get kicked out' and there'll be 5+ times the number of likes compared to boosts and it's like, you are not helping, you are not contributing, you are telling a vulnerable person you saw their struggle and couldn't be bothered to press one button to give them a slightly wider reach
social media is anything but and mastodon has not ever been and will not ever be better than twitter or any similar contrived microblogging platform for as long as it retains the favourite button
"but they're acknowledging you" no they are being unhelpful and you are being patronizing
and i don't mean in a mansplaining kind of way or "how do i do x in y" "use z instead"
i mean "how do i do x" "rando favourited your post"
like it's just non-sequiturs. i'm in a don hertzfeldt skit
who am i kidding nothing has really changed since 2017 we're still giving non-answers to question posts and trying to explain why that is a correct thing to do
webdevs who learnt their craft prior to 2010 should brand themselves as "html over the wire engineers"
scourge of the fediverse, retired computer fairies founder (2017-2021), drone #6502, official amiga mascot, begrudgingly making a return to the fediverse to upset those who told us to leave. i've been here longer than you.
https://pronoun.gdn/byte?or=it, robot, check system link above, meat shell is 30yo, no minors thanks
HRT: 15/11/2015
⚠️ do not like or favourite my negative posts: https://computerfairi.es/@mavica_again/110573733959251340 you will be blocked for not following protocol