Show newer

@arielmt text editors that you launch from the command line generally make you name the file first, but they don't have Auto saving.

The lack of autosaving in these programs is such a rediculous oversight

Money request. 

Hey all. It's your favourite sheep girl, Loki~.

I'm struggling a bit monetarily. I've worked myself super hard this month at my new job, and I get paid a week from today, but as it stands I currently don't have enough to feed myself just for this week, and I'd greatly appreciate it if anyone could spare a little just to help me live this week.

I don't need much, just enough for some food this week.
Thanks again.

ko-fi.com/laufeysdottir

interesting linguistic divergence in English 

@intherain in linguistics, the criteria for "legitimate word" is just "do a certain number of people use it"

Linguists describe how the grammar rules work, rather than prescribe how they should work.

Doctor Who, Moffat, opinion 

@Doggo Mary Sue is exactly it – Moffat's Doctor is never in genuine peril, and he's always good, and he's better and more moral than everyone around, and he's a badass, and he can do things that are basically just arbitrarily magical

@arielmt @maple I like :computerfairies: , but I'm not sure if it'll be clear that it's an emoji picker, so maybe one of the others?

death, vent (---) 

@Lucariwhoa@snouts.online feeling like a disappointment is really rough, I'm sorry lizzie

*offers gentle hugs*

interesting linguistic divergence in English 

"would of", on the other hand, is a compound – you cannot divide it into individual words, because you can't say "I of done it"

but you* CAN say "I would of done it"

so we have this divergence where a formerly derivable phrase is becoming a compound!

*"you" means "a speaker who considers this grammatically valid"

Show thread

interesting linguistic divergence in English 

I've noticed an "error" that some local people make when writing messages: a few people have been writing "would of" instead of "would've"

At first, my Editor brain wanted to correct them, but then my linguistics brain took over – this is really interesting!

"would have" has a derivable meaning – each word stands alone, and you can easily figure it out:

"I have done it"
"I would have done it"

(cont)

Doctor Who, Moffat, opinion 

@lizardsquid That's one of the reasons I stopped watching after Eleven. I grew bored of the formula, all the unnecessary season-long plot lines.

Moffat doesn't write characters - he writes a god in human skin and the entire universe are just dominos around him.

Doctor Who, Moffat, opinion 

And then there's the interstellar organisation dedicated to killing The Doctor.

Over and over again, Moffat makes the Doctor this mythical figure, that can never be defeated. And it takes all the fun and adventure out of it – I don't want an ultra-important person, I want to see a Doctor who goes on adventures, who follows where whimsy takes them, and who ends up saving people in distress.

But Moffat treats The Doctor as though they're a God.

Show thread

Doctor Who, Moffat, opinion 

One of the major gripes I have with Moffat's writing of Doctor Who (approx. 2010–2017) is that the Doctor is portrayed as being the most important person in the universe.

The speech from "The Pandorica Opens" ( youtube.com/watch?v=Pa74e8oAvI ) is the doctor talking about how special he is.

Then there's the question ( youtu.be/lGDC0n89nhA?t=1m39s ). "The oldest question in the universe, and the one that must never be answered".... is "Doctor Who?"

(cont)

Show older
Computer Fairies

Computer Fairies is a Mastodon instance that aims to be as queer, friendly and furry as possible. We welcome all kinds of computer fairies!