I'm so proud of myself for adding the navigation buttons to the webpage, tbh... it makes it a lot nicer, and I did a surprisingly good job designing them

Show thread

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 11:53

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 11:53

Jul 22, 2018, 11:53

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

@kity@sleeping.town oh jeez

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** · Jul 22, 2018, 11:36

Lizardsquid, maker of noises boosted

**Fenreliania** @Fenreliania@glitch.social · Jul 22, 2018, 11:36

Jul 22, 2018, 11:36

Fenreliania @Fenreliania@glitch.social

/o/ Flip
\o\ Flap
/o/ Flip
\o\ Flap

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 11:36

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 11:36

Jul 22, 2018, 11:36

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

Classic Doctor Who :: [Season 4]

The first story of season 4 is so awful that it took me a week to build up the energy to watch it.

It's hard to even explain how it's bad, it's just... boring and predictable and nothing happens, and it has the same problem that almost all of the historical stories do: there's no energy. No-one seems to care all that much.

And it's made even worse by being a reconstruction, so you've only got stills of the actor's faces.

Show thread

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 11:31

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 11:31

Jul 22, 2018, 11:31

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

@Fenreliania oh my gosh that looks amazing

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 11:01

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 11:01

Jul 22, 2018, 11:01

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

@kity@sleeping.town yes

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 10:59

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 10:59

Jul 22, 2018, 10:59

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

@BatElite @lucidiot@tiny.tilde.website oh my gosh I'm giggling

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** · Jul 22, 2018, 10:52

Lizardsquid, maker of noises boosted

**BatElite, Inactive here** @BatElite@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 10:52

Jul 22, 2018, 10:52

BatElite, Inactive here @BatElite@computerfairi.es

@lizardsquid @lucidiot@tiny.tilde.website The making of Lizardsquid.

6151924e95b9b5a9.png

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 10:34

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 10:34

Jul 22, 2018, 10:34

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

@BatElite @lucidiot@tiny.tilde.website ;;)

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 10:27

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 10:27

Jul 22, 2018, 10:27

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

@lucidiot@tiny.tilde.website @BatElite this is just lambda calculus, which you don't need to know.

In haskell, the way to express the same thing is a little more simple:

(λf x → f x)

(or without special unicode: (\f x -> f x) )

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 10:23

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 10:23

Jul 22, 2018, 10:23

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

@lucidiot@tiny.tilde.website @BatElite that isn't correct

(λf . (λx . (f x))

is an expression that basically means "if I'm given a function, called f, and a value, called x, then I will apply that function to the value"

so if I wrote (λf . (λx . (f x)) (addFive) (3), the expression means "run addFive on 3", so we'll get a result of 8

(of course this is a completely useless transformation, I could just directly write "addFive 3")

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** · Jul 22, 2018, 04:18

Lizardsquid, maker of noises boosted

**iliana (quiet main)** @iliana@cybre.space · Jul 22, 2018, 04:18

Jul 22, 2018, 04:18

iliana (quiet main) @iliana@cybre.space

wow it’s several mastodon users!

0f12380023962dd4.jpeg

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 04:16

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 04:16

Jul 22, 2018, 04:16

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

:technologist_g1:

@g I've found that a bit difficult in idris too...

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 04:13

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 04:13

Jul 22, 2018, 04:13

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

problem, tumblr, porn kinda, may contain lewd words

@lottie jeez...

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 03:58

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 03:58

Jul 22, 2018, 03:58

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

:technologist_g1:

@g the first - because I *think* (not certain) that the nodes function can be shown to be monotonically decreasing the size of the data structure, and coq might by deriving that proof automatically

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 03:42

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 03:42

Jul 22, 2018, 03:42

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

:technologist_g1:

@g does coq assume inductive types are finite?

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 03:01

**Lizardsquid, maker of noises** @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es · Jul 22, 2018, 03:01

Jul 22, 2018, 03:01

Lizardsquid, maker of noises @lizardsquid@computerfairi.es

I'm listening to a dubstep mix that I censored a track out of, and I'm... impressed I managed to censor any of it at all given that this section of the mix has FOUR different songs playing at once