Follow

well, and are continuing to be run by "is this just them being hopelessly naiive, or is this some sort of malice"

i'd still think a "hey, we're sorry bout the screw-up" would be in order, as it now just leaves the rules stressing about how they totally will have moderators accepting reports from other instances hanging there awkwardly, smelling of an unfinished scandal.

the effort is commendable - but boy, that removal of examples of harassment is GLARING.

the attribution's right there at least for the open-source community guidelines. but comparing the two?

community-covenant.net/version lays out explicitly bad behavior to avoid.

just says "don't be bad. and if you have any questions about what bad is, privately contact an admin."

listen, i may not be a tech wunderkid, but i've been around for awhile. "follow the rules or else. the rules are all unspoken and we're not going to elaborate more unless it's in private." ...is dodgy.

ultimately it always translates to "we don't publicly post the rules because every single person gets a different version of them to follow, depending on sex, gender, skin color, phase of the moon, and if we like you or not."

aka, get ready for the bff of a mod to get away with murder while you get bounced for eating a hot dog with mustard instead of kechup.

or, the more likely variant in this case? " refuses to list rules because who stays and who goes depends on $$ given"

this is either planned maliciousness, OR a level of naiivete that means the ethical security offers can never be fulfilled.

this is a safe space, but being run by people who think that a safe space can first be achieved by no moderator reports at all (!), and now is emphatically saying safety can be achieved by NOT letting people who are targets of specific types of harassment know they're safe because the space is explicitly against sexism/racism/etc.

...peak techbro.

i honestly do not see the sense in *why* someone would, as a non-bad actor, look at the pre-baked community covenant and go

"ok, now that we've listed examples of how to be a good community member, here's the section about bad shit you shouldn't do. ...let's just say don't do bad things. i know these are all good examples that will let people know we will not tolerate that sort of thing here, thus making it a safe and appealing space. ...but let's just take all that out, we don't need it :)"

this is becoming a running gag for i feel.

"ethics" okay, how is your company ethical "with ethics!" don't you think if your company is ethical you should acknowledge better how you're using open-source stuff "BUT WE'RE ETHICAL"

"we're against harassment!" okay, how are you doing that "we're against it!" what do you consider harassment "we're against harassment." so... you're against taking any stand about what harassment is, other than being against it. "we're against harassment!"

@wigglytuffitout either that or it's because there aren't any and they know that won't play well if they actually come out and say it

@InspectorCaracal "well i've never been harassed online so i don't see a need for any of that! it's irrelevant! anyway the marketplace of ideas will handle it :)"

peak TechBro ™️

@wigglytuffitout oh god "marketplace of ideas" is the most cringe-worthy thing I've read all week

@InspectorCaracal honestly i'm sure you could

either that or my initial assessment is right and purism/librem.one is being run by a marketing manager who saw it as a great moneymaking opportunity, but tried to learn a little of the lingo to smooth over the con, and put on an audiobook about online ethics on while he slept, but it skipped and repeated one bit

so now he can only say 'ethics', rather like

@sydneyfalk y e p.

whether they're shitters themselves, or just willing to look the other way if they get their money at the end of the day, i don't know. and i don't know if it even matters.

and this is the company that's selling all their other products on "ethics!" because "we promise, we won't ever access your account or do evil things... we're ethical! ethics! :) please give us money for being good good ethics boys."

lmao yea cool they're gonna sell shit in a heartbeat with this attitude

@wigglytuffitout I read it as a refusal to take responsibility, combined with privilege that stops them from taking the consequences seriously.

@wigglytuffitout
Ew gross.... eating a hotdog with ketchup? 🤢

Oh yeah, also the @purism policy is gross too.
Do they want to be twitter? This is how you get twitter.

@wigglytuffitout the fact that it says to *privately* contact an admin is the biggest red flag there. >.>

Like, I can understand not wanting to go on record with specific rules so people don't rules-lawyer you - that's why my CoC here is the way it is - but that's different. People can publicly ask me for clarification and request additions and shit, it's fine, I don't make my expectations a *secret*.

@chartier @sydneyfalk i mean i think that's the definition of a good 99% of silicon valley.

"i never needed x, so nobody will need x. let's innovate past it! :) "

at some point the absolute dearth of empathy for other people, listening to other people, considering other viewpoints, or even just thinking logically about why things exist, all melds together into a wonderful ball of shit so rank even dungbeetles refuse to move it, and we are all made worse for existing in the world that it does

@wigglytuffitout @sydneyfalk Dungbeetles. I love it.

Anyway I wish we were less awful. I’m sorry.

@chartier @sydneyfalk don't worry, i'm thinking the silicon valley salesman moving on to the benefits of raw water will probably a least make them slow down a bit

as they're in the toilet with beaver fever, but, y'know, i'll take what i can get

@wigglytuffitout @sydneyfalk On the bright side: I bet the anti-vaxxer crowd won’t see #BeaverFever coming.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Computer Fairies

Computer Fairies is a Mastodon instance that aims to be as queer, friendly and furry as possible. We welcome all kinds of computer fairies!